Hilcorp says it 'contributes' $1 billion in taxes and royalties
Hilcorp opposes the proposal that owner Texas billionaire Jeff Hildebrand be forced to start paying an oil tax that has always applied to ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil.
The proposal is “punitive” and aimed at Hilcorp and Hildebrand, according to one of Hildebrand’s Alaska executives. The state failed to amend the law when Hildebrand bought BP’s major Alaska holdings in 2019.
The missive includes all of the usual suspects: The amendment to close the loophole is flawed. Closing the loophole would make North Slope natural gas more expensive. Closing the loophole would reduce the amount of money that Hildebrand has to invest in Cook Inlet to provide natural gas. Closing the loophole would threaten future investment. It’s not fair to Hilcorp to close the loophole.
One of the newer arguments for keeping the loophole is that the details of closing the loophole are so complicated that they should not be left to a future Department of Revenue.
Under Dunleavy the revenue department has been hollowed out with lots of vacancies. Dunleavy has created an age of missing revenue information.
Hilcorp seems to be hinting at this self-inflicted state deficiency.
“A tax of this complexity requires regulations, reporting systems, audit procedures, taxpayer guidance, and trained personnel. Promulgating regulations without clear legislative direction and a detailed statutory framework would leave fundamental tax-policy decisions to a future Department of Revenue tax director rather than the Legislature. Establishing tax policy is the responsibility of elected policymakers and should not be delegated to administrative officials through an incomplete statute,” Hilcorp says.
“The proposed tax remains structurally incomplete and insufficiently developed,” says Hilcorp.
Rest assured that Hilcorp would oppose a complete statute that is structurally complete and sufficiently developed.
The conference committee proposal rejected by Dunleavy, Hilcorp and its allies had a delayed starting date, which would have given the future Department of Revenue sufficient time to work out the complexities. Hilcorp doesn’t care for that idea.
Hilcorp has a vested interest in avoiding the tax paid by the other major firms.
“Annually Hilcorp contributes around $1 billion in combined taxes and royalties,” says Luke Saugier, a senior VP of Hilcorp Alaska LLC, the company owned by Texas billionaire Jeff Hildebrand.
Hildebrand’s company does not contribute money to Alaska.
Hilcorp contributed millions in 2020 to defeat an oil tax initiative, claiming that establishing tax policy was too complicated to be done by initiative.
The money that Hilcorp pays to Alaska for royalties is for oil that belongs to Alaskans. It’s not a gift from Hildebrand.
Oil royalties make up the largest portion of petroleum income under our current tax structure.
It is deceptive for Saugier to convey the impression that Hilcorp paying royalties to the state represents corporate largesse from the Texas billionaire.
The March forecast says that Hilcorp, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil are expected to pay a combined total of about $1 billion in oil royalties this fiscal year.
They are expected to pay about $456 million in oil production taxes.
The petroleum corporate income tax, which is paid by ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil plus a few smaller companies, is expected to total $210 million this fiscal year.
Thanks to the Hilcorp loophole, Hilcorp does not pay any of that corporate income tax. And it doesn’t want to start.
Your contributions help support independent analysis and political commentary by Alaska reporter and author Dermot Cole. Thank you for reading and for your support. Either click here to use PayPal or send checks to: Dermot Cole, Box 10673, Fairbanks, AK 99710-0673.