AIDEA to spend $190 million on ANWR with no public review or public hearing
The rubber-stamp board of the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority is likely to vote Wednesday to approve a $190 million ANWR spending plan that was posted on the state public notice website Sunday.
There is nothing on the AIDEA website that explains the $190 million spending plan and nothing that explains how and when to testify. There is nothing that justifies AIDEA’s secret decision to bid on more tracts in ANWR in the current lease sale aimed at the private sector.
In April, AIDEA claimed that its leases contain 4 billion barrels of oil. If so, those leases will be worth a fortune to oil companies. If so, those leases should be sold.
Max Graham, who works with Nat Herz at the Northern Journal, has the details on the $190 million plan in the story below posted today.
Projects of this magnitude should be subject to a thorough public review. But AIDEA and its rubber-stamp board do not operate that way.
Projects of this magnitude should be part of the state capital budget, but the governor avoids that bothersome process by having AIDEA dip into its giant slush fund to pay for anything that the governor supports.
It is ironic that the Legislature, now working through the final days of the session, will debate and argue over much smaller and less significant projects than this one, while Dunleavy’s AIDEA board will sign off on anything put in front of them.
AIDEA’s claims that “It’s time to move forward and get the oil and gas on the coastal plain, on our leases, producing for the nation,” is misleading. It will take billions of dollars to do that.
Instead of looking to spend $175 million on geologic tests in ANWR and up to $15 million on ANWR lease sale bids, the agency should be looking to sell its ANWR leases to private industry, seeing as how GOP politicians say the Golden Age of ANWR lease sale now taking place will prove that oil companies can’t wait to get going on oil development.
“Mothership AIDEA has done, frankly, little to nothing on a consistent basis to tell our story,” Stieren said in an email to reporter Nat Herz.
Here is the story today from Northern Journal:
By MAX GRAHAM
Alaska’s industrial development agency this week is set to vote on spending $190 million on controversial plans for oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
The budget, drafted by staff and still pending approval by the agency’s governor-appointed board, includes up to $175 million for advanced geologic testing, plus as much as $15 million to bid on new areas of the refuge in an upcoming federal lease sale.
If approved, the plans from the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, or AIDEA, could represent a major step toward development in the refuge. They could also represent a massive expenditure, as $190 million exceeds the yearly general fund budgets of more than half of Alaska’s executive branch agencies.
The refuge occupies the state’s northeast corner, east of existing oil infrastructure, and its future has been the subject of a fierce, decades-long national debate. No oil is produced there now, and just one community sits within it, the Iñupiaq village of Kaktovik.
AIDEA’s proposed spending is outlined in a resolution that the authority’s board is set to discuss at a meeting Wednesday. The state published a notice about the meeting on Sunday.
The geologic work, known as seismic testing, involves searching for oil deep underground by using sound waves — a technique that geologists liken to an ultrasound of the earth.
The program would allow the agency to move to “the next level” of exploration and development in the Arctic refuge, according to Randy Ruaro, AIDEA’s executive director and a former chief of staff to Gov. Mike Dunleavy. But it would also come with risk, as there is no guarantee that exploration would lead to the discovery of profitable deposits; the authority's critics say its money would be better invested in Alaska's permanent fund.
AIDEA bought seven leases in the refuge, totaling about 365,000 acres, at a sale held during the first Trump administration five years ago. But it has yet to do any exploratory work.
“It’s time to move forward and get the oil and gas on the coastal plain, on our leases, producing for the nation,” Ruaro said in a brief phone interview Sunday.
There could be “billions and billions of barrels of oil” beneath the refuge’s 1.5-million-acre coastal plain, Ruaro added. He cited an October report commissioned by AIDEA that describes the refuge's coastal plain as the "most prospective unexplored onshore area in North America," citing new discoveries just to the west.
The area’s true oil and gas potential has long been a mystery, though; much of the geologic data that’s been collected there is decades old, and preliminary. Reporting by the New York Times before the 2021 lease sale indicated that confidential results from the sole test well drilled inside the refuge were not encouraging.
The Trump administration is currently taking sealed bids in another lease sale in the refuge, with 700,000 acres available and results to be announced June 5.
AIDEA intends to submit bids, according to Ruaro. “We’re absolutely interested,” he said.
AIDEA’s board chair, Bill Kendig, declined to answer questions Sunday about the proposed spending.
The proposal on Wednesday’s agenda explicitly exempts authorization for “drilling or well execution,” but Ruaro said the board could change that at the meeting.
The prospect of oil development in the refuge — the nation’s largest federal wildlife reserve — has been hotly debated for 50 years.
Leaders from Kaktovik and other North Slope communities largely support opening the coastal plain to oil companies.
But the area includes the calving grounds of the Porcupine caribou herd — a cultural touchstone and important traditional food source for the Gwich’in people, who live over the Brooks Range to the south but still within the herd’s migration route, and who are stridently opposed to oil development.
The refuge also provides habitat for migratory birds, polar bears and musk oxen.
Until 2021, the area was never formally opened for oil development, in spite of intense lobbying efforts by Alaska’s congressional delegation.
And it remains far from existing oil infrastructure, which is concentrated near the massive Prudhoe Bay field some 60 miles to the west.
The oil industry itself showed little interest in the first-ever lease sale in the refuge, in 2021. AIDEA was the top bidder, and no major companies participated.
The Biden administration canceled AIDEA’s leases in 2023. But a federal judge later restored them, and the industry’s outlook in the Arctic has shifted since then, with huge demand at a recent lease sale in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
Nonetheless, opponents of drilling in the Arctic Refuge say they’ll be fighting AIDEA’s move toward development.
Kristen Moreland, executive director of the Gwich’in Steering Committee, called it a “deeply unpopular project” that lacks a “meaningful public engagement process.”
“They know that they don’t have the support of the majority of Alaskans, and most certainly don’t want to face the voices of Gwich’in,” Moreland said in a text message Sunday. “We will continue to fight any entity that bids on leases on the coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge under the legally questionable grounds that this administration is holding a lease sale on. This is way too important to the survival of the Gwich’in and their communities.”
Max Graham is a reporter for the Northern Journal. Subscription information can be found here.