Paul Jenkins wasn't paying attention to what candidate Mike Dunleavy promised

Paul Jenkins, who has been pontificating about Alaska for nearly as long as I have, wrote a column in the Anchorage Daily News saying that the giant budget cuts proposed by Gov. Mike Dunleavy are in keeping with the Dunleavy campaign promises.

That’s what people who didn’t pay attention to Dunleavy’s promises are now claiming.

Jenkins wrote, “Dunleavy the candidate promised during the election to do just what he has done and he was no shrinking violet about it, either. Dunleavy said he would balance the budget, pursue a fully funded Permanent Fund dividend as required by state law, and repay Alaskans three years of dividends shortstopped by former Gov. Bill Walker and the Legislature. Oh, and he opposed an income tax.”

“The only way to make ends meet without taxes or filching money from the Permanent Fund Earnings Reserve or slashing dividends is to cut, cut, cut,” says Jenkins.

But Dunleavy the candidate did not promise to cut, cut, cut. Dunleavy the candidate promised to not cut, cut, cut.

My brother is offering Jenkins $50 plus breakfast and lunch at Denny’s if Paul can show where Dunleavy promised to cut services or programs.

As Dunleavy told the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner in August, “I do not have a specific program I would like to reduce or eliminate.”

When pressed to name specific budget cuts as a candidate, as readers of this blog know, Dunleavy often falsely claimed that there were 2,000 funded but unfilled jobs that he would eliminate to save $200 million. He also liked to mention a $4.5 million rail study he would cut, along with “climatologists.” He promised to make everything in state government more efficient. That’s what he promised.

The 2,000 ghost jobs and the $200 million slush fund never existed. The rail study couldn’t be cut because it was never approved. The climate adviser position was eliminated, “saving” $145,000 a year, but not really. (Overall staffing in the governor’s office would climb from 136 to 154 under the Dunleavy plan, mainly because of the 15 budget positions transferred so that they are now under the supervision of the temporary budget director from Michigan.)

After months of mentioning the rail study and climatologists, a Dunleavy spokesman claimed the candidate “misspoke.”

The major news organizations in Alaska have not bothered with comparing Dunleavy campaign blather about “right-sizing government” and “efficiencies” with the details. I haven’t seen any coverage examining the hollow nature of Dunleavy’s few specific budget-cut promises.

Here is a draft consumer guide to Dunleavy promises to not cut the ferry system, public schools, the University of Alaska, the Pioneers Home, the court system, the prison system, state Troopers and Power Cost Equalization. It also includes his promises to increase spending on education, the courts, Troopers and prosecutors.

KTUU debate, Oct. 25: Dunleavy said efficiencies would get the budget to $4 billion and it could grow at 2 percent a year. Asked to name specific cuts, he said: “$ 4.5 million fast rail study from Mat-Su to Anchorage, I would eliminate that. I would look at eliminating climatologists. We have over 2,000 funded but unfilled positions in state government. I would look at those positions to see what positions and what funding we could move to other parts of government to reduce the size of government.”

AFN debate, Oct. 19: “Does your plan for leading Alaska out of this fiscal crisis include additional cuts to state departments? If so, which departments? And specifically, which programs and how much do you intend to further cut?”

Dunleavy said he would not cut services, but he would manage them better and find efficiencies. He said he would manage Medicaid better.

“I also would be looking at potentially consolidating, on a volunteer basis, the insurances, for example, for school districts and cities and municipalities, to bring them into the state Alaska Care to drive down the cost. There have been estimates that if we do that we could save anywhere from $100 to $150 million going forward. I would start with these efficiencies first in order to realize some cost savings.”

“We also have, for example, a fast rail study from Palmer to Anchorage, where I live, in the valley. We don’t need to be paying $4.5 million for a fast rail study at this point when we need money for Troopers. We need money for prosecuting attorneys. So I’ll be looking at those items first before we really get into talking about any reductions in terms of cuts in programs first.”

He also said he would increase spending on rural education and would not close small schools. “What I want to do is beef up what we have in the regional areas like Kotzebue, Nome, Barrow, Bethel, so that kids can go to school there, potentially take some college classes,” Dunleavy told AFN.

KTVA debate, Aug. 17: At the 36-minute mark, Dunleavy said he would not cut public education spending, the Pioneer Homes, the court system, prisons, Troopers, Power Cost Equalization, the prison system or the University of Alaska. He would not answer “yes or no” if he would cut Medicaid, but said “Yes, make it more efficient.”

Dunleavy said he wanted to limit the operating budget to $4.1 billion to $4.3 billion and allow it to grow at 2 percent a year. “If we’re able to do this we can grow ourselves out of this predicament with the new oil finds that are close to the pipeline,” he said.

KTVA debate, Nov. 1: Dunleavy repeated his claim that 2,000 funded jobs can be eliminated. He also said he would not cut Troopers, prisons, the courts, Pioneer Homes or the University of Alaska. Asked about educational vouchers, he said, “I don’t have any plans of submitting a bill.” At the 32-minute mark he said he would not cut Troopers, the court system, prisons, Pioneer homes or the University of Alaska.

Bristol Bay Fish Expo debate, June 9: At the 27-minute mark, he said he would increase spending on public education. At the 31-minute mark, he would do this “through cost-shifting and reductions of health care costs.” He said he would not cut health insurance benefits.

He said he would cut the fast rail study and “climatologists.”

Alaska Public Media, Sept. 4: Dunleavy said he has plans to cut $450 million from the state budget in ways that will make government more efficient and not lead to any reduction in services.

Just before the 26-minute mark, he said he would cut 2,000 funded but unfilled positions to save $200 million, save $100 million with a voluntary school district health insurance consolidation plan, and save $150 million by making Medicaid more efficient.

"That could get our budget down to about $4.1 billion without cuts. If we get our budget down to about $4, $4.1 billion, somewhere in that neighborhood, and then let it grow—the operating aspect of the budget, the operating side of the budget—at about 2 percent a year, we can maintain, we can keep up with some inflationary costs at 2 percent a year. But it also gives us some breathing room to get these other resources on line, to get this other oil in the pipeline and increase our revenue stream,” he said.

Anchorage Chamber of Commerce, Sept. 10: Just before the 16-minute mark, he said a budget of $4 billion a year that would grow at 2 percent a year would buy the state time to get 300,000 more barrels of oil in the pipeline.

Alaska Chamber of Commerce, Oct. 24: He said he would use funds from the Constitutional Budget Reserve if necessary to fill the deficit. After the 23-minute mark he said the state had 2,000 funded but unfilled positions that he would take money from to fight crime. He said he would not fund the fast-rail study or climatologists.

Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, Aug. 15: Asked to name a specific program he would reduce or eliminate, Dunleavy said, “I do not have a specific program I would like to reduce or eliminate. I do want to audit all programs to make sure they are delivering the services as promised in the most efficient way possible.”

Anchorage Daily News, Aug. 16: “If we can contain this operating budget at about 2 percent growth per year with a baseline ideally of $4.3 billion, we have a chance to grow this economy and be able to pay for the budgets going forward. So at an operating budget of about 4.3, you're looking at about $80 some million growth per year at 2 percent. We can pay for this through the CBR's (Constitutional Budget Reserve's) fees and settlements that it receives on average every year, about $100 million. We wouldn't have to go to the corpus of the CBR to do this.”

Ketchikan Daily News, Feb.16: Dunleavy said last April that he would look for ways to make the ferry system more efficient,

“That’s not code word for lopping off and chopping off big aspects of it,” Dunleavy said. “But no, give us some feedback, ‘What are some ways we could make (AMHS) more efficient, what are some ways we can run the ferry better, and work with folks that are on the ground?”

“But it’s crucial,” he said. “You can’t eliminate the ferry system in Southeast Alaska, that’s how we get around.”

(If you want to receive daily updates of commentary and analysis, sign up for a free subscription with your email address at the bottom of this page.)

Dermot Cole30 Comments