Three public comments have been submitted online to the state as of Wednesday morning on the waste management permit for the proposed open-pit Tetlin mine. Here’s how to add yours to the list.
Read MoreKinross is telling Alaskans that it is not economical to build an ore processing facility at the high-grade gold deposit near Tetlin, so it has no choice but to use the highway system to truck ore to the Fort Knox mine for processing.
But there is good reason to dispute the claim.
Why?
Because a 2018 study of the proposed Tetlin project—before Kinross got involved—found that a mine project built at Tetlin would be an economical and profitable venture for all concerned, even with a gold price of $1,250 per ounce. Gold is now about $1,830 an ounce.
Read MoreThe Dunleavy administration hadn’t planned to move ahead this soon with the replacement of five major bridges between Tetlin and the Fort Knox mine until the Kinross plan to use the highways as a haul road for mining trucks came along.
Read MoreOne of the secret investments, the amount unknown, made on behalf of Alaskans by a contractor hired by the Alaska Permanent Fund is in a California company called SafeAI.
The description released to the public by McKinley Capital says SafeAI is “focused on retrofitting heavy equipment with AI technology to prevent accidents.”
But that language does not fully convey the corporate mission of SafeAI‚—the promotion of robotic vehicles for mining and construction, a goal that goes far beyond safety.
Read MoreThey subscribe to the Dunleavy lockbox plan for the budget. First, you create a lockbox to limit state spending. Everyone likes a good lockbox. Only after the lockbox is in the Alaska Constitution do you bother to tell anyone what won’t fit inside.“It’s a lockbox and then you kind of duke it out, if you need to, what’s inside that lockbox,” is how Dunleavy described his vision of a painless process in 2016.
They don’t want to talk now about what won’t in the lockbox of the future. Road maintenance? Public safety? Schools? Don’t worry about any of that now, they say.
Read MoreThe Alaska Permanent Fund board of trustees reviewed the so-called "in-state” investment program earlier this month and some of the issues that arise from the $200 million program.
My major complaint all along has been about the claim by the fund managers that they can keep all investment details—including the names of recipients and the purpose of investments—secret, based on a line inserted into state law for another reason more than four decades ago.
But secrecy is not the only issue to consider.
Read MoreGov. Mike Dunleavy appointed Dave Weisz of Wasilla, the president of Three Bears, to the state fisheries board last March.
Last fall Dunleavy staged a campaign event to announce the amount of the 2022 Permanent Fund Dividend at the Three Bears store in Palmer.
Weisz resigned from the fish board in October, writing that his personal circumstances were such that he didn’t have the time to do the position justice. He was replaced by Stan Zuray in December.
A year ago the state secretly invested in Three Bears through the Alaska Permanent Fund. The investment was kept secret until last week. The exact amount of the investment is still a secret.
Read MoreA year ago the news broke that an investment firm called Westward Partners had purchased the Three Bears grocery chain, which has 20 stores in Alaska and Montana and $300 million in annual sales.
But there was no hint that the state of Alaska was a secret investor in the deal through the Alaska Permanent Fund last February.
Read More
The state House censured Republican Rep. David Eastman Wednesday on a 35-1 vote, with Eastman providing the only pro-Eastman vote.
Despite the near unanimous vote, however, let’s admit that a motion to censure is symbolic, not significant. The House refused to take real action against Eastman for belonging to an anti-government militia, but it should at least remove him from the judiciary committee and find a better legislator to fill that seat.
Read MoreRep. David Eastman had plenty of chances to apologize for his remarks about the long-term “benefits” to society when a child is killed by an abuser. That Eastman refused to do so is another reason why someone of his ilk doesn’t belong in the Legislature.
Read More